Newsletters
The IRS released the optional standard mileage rates for 2025. Most taxpayers may use these rates to compute deductible costs of operating vehicles for:business,medical, andcharitable purposesSome mem...
The IRS, in partnership with the Coalition Against Scam and Scheme Threats (CASST), has unveiled new initiatives for the 2025 tax filing season to counter scams targeting taxpayers and tax professio...
The IRS reminded disaster-area taxpayers that they have until February 3, 2025, to file their 2023 returns, in the entire states of Louisiana and Vermont, all of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands and...
The IRS has announced plans to issue automatic payments to eligible individuals who failed to claim the Recovery Rebate Credit on their 2021 tax returns. The credit, a refundable benefit for individ...
Ohio has amended the commercial activity tax law to clarify that gross receipts from the sale or lease of a motor vehicle are only sitused to Ohio if a certificate of title with an Ohio address is iss...
President Donald Trump targeted federal hiring, including specific rules for the Internal Revenue Service, and the United States’ participation in the global tax framework being developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development among his flurry of executive orders signed on the first day of his second term in the Oval Office.
President Donald Trump targeted federal hiring, including specific rules for the Internal Revenue Service, and the United States’ participation in the global tax framework being developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development among his flurry of executive orders signed on the first day of his second term in the Oval Office.
In one order, President Trump ordered "a freeze on the hiring of Federal civilian employees, to be applied throughout the executive branch. As part of this freeze, no Federal civilian position that is vacant at noon on January 20, 2025, may be filled, and no new position may be created except as otherwise proved for in this memorandum or other applicable law."
The order calls on the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of Government Efficiency to "submit a plan to reduce the size of the Federal Government’s workforce through efficiency improvements and attrition."
When that plan is created, the executive order will expire, with the exception of hiring for the Internal Revenue Service.
"This memorandum shall remain in effect for the IRS until the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Director of OMB and the Administrator of [DOGE], determine that it is in the national interest to lift the freeze," the order continues.
The order also prohibits the hiring of contractors to circumvent the order.
In a separate executive order, President Trump has effectively removed the United States from the OECD global corporate tax framework, stating that it "has no force or effect in the United States."
The order goes on to state that "any commitments made by the prior administration on behalf of the United States with respect to the Global Tax Deal have no force or effect within the United States absent any act by the Congress adopting the relevant provisions of the Global Tax Deal."
The framework calls for a 15 percent minimum corporate income tax and has provisions that allow countries to collect a "top-up tax" from companies in countries with a lower rate, something the memo called "retaliatory."
By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is keeping beneficial reporting information reporting voluntary even though the Supreme Court has lifted the injunction that was put in place by a lower court to keep the BOI regulation from being enforced.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is keeping beneficial reporting information reporting voluntary even though the Supreme Court has lifted the injunction that was put in place by a lower court to keep the BOI regulation from being enforced.
"In light of a recent federal court order, reporting companies are not currently required to file beneficial ownership information with FinCEN and are not subject to liability if they fail to do so while the order remains in force," the agency posted to its website on January 24, 2025. "However, reporting companies may continue to voluntarily submit beneficial ownership information reports."
The posting follows a Supreme Court order stating on January 23, 2025, that the injunction put in place by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on December 5, 2024, was removed.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson offered a dissenting opinion on lifting the injunction.
"However likely the Government’s success on the merits may be, in my view, emergency relief is not appropriate because the applicant has failed to demonstrate sufficient exigency to justify our interventions," Justice Jackson wrote, citing two reasons: the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has already expedited the hearing of the case and the government has deferred the implementation of the regulations on its own accord.
"The Government has provided no indication that injury of a more serious or significant nature would result if the Act’s implementation is further delayed while the litigation proceeds in the lower courts. I would therefore deny the application and permit the appellate process to run its course," Justice Jackson added.
By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor
The Treasury and IRS have issued final regulations that provide rules for classifying digital and cloud transactions. The rules apply for purposes of the international provisions of the Code.
The rules retain the overall approach of the proposed regulations (NPRM REG-130700-14, August 14, 2019), with some revisions.
The Treasury and IRS also issued proposed regulations that provide sourcing rules for cloud transactions.
The Treasury and IRS have issued final regulations that provide rules for classifying digital and cloud transactions. The rules apply for purposes of the international provisions of the Code.
The rules retain the overall approach of the proposed regulations (NPRM REG-130700-14, August 14, 2019), with some revisions.
The Treasury and IRS also issued proposed regulations that provide sourcing rules for cloud transactions.
Background
Reg. §1.861-18 provides rules for classifying cross-border transactions involving digitized information, specifically computer programs, broadly grouped into the following categories:
- the transfer of a copyright;
- the transfer of a copyrighted article;
- the provision of services for the development or modification of a computer program; and
- the provision of know-how relating to the development of a computer program.
The 1998 final regulations focus on the distinction between the transfer of the copyright itself and transfer of a copyrighted article, using a substance-over-form characterization approach and by examining the underlying rights granted to the transferee. Transfers of copyrights and copyrighted articles are further characterized as complete or partial transfers, resulting in the transfers being characterized as either sales or licenses, in the case of a copyrights, or sales or leases, in the case of a copyrighted articles.
2025 Final Regulations
The 2025 final regulations maintain the basic framework for characterizing transfers of content and extend the characterization framework to digital content. Digital content is generally defined as any computer program or other content protected by copyright law, not just transactions involving computer programs.
The categories of transactions include:
- the transfer of a copyright in the digital content;
- the transfer of a copy of the digital content (a copyrighted article);
- the provision of services for the development or modification of the digital content; and
- the provision of know-how relating to the development of digital content.
The 2025 final regulations also provide for cloud transactions and characterize the transactions as a provision of services.
Cloud transactions are generally defined as transactions through which a person obtains on-demand network access to computer hardware, digital content, or similar resources.
The 2025 final regulations replace the de minimis rule and the concept of arrangement with a predominant character rule that applies to both digital content transactions and cloud transactions. Under the rule, a transaction with multiple elements is characterized based on the predominant character of the transaction.
Request for Comments on 2025 Final Regulations
The Treasury and IRS are considering whether the characterization rules should apply to all provisions of the Code and have requested comments on any specific areas that would be affected, with examples if appropriate. Comments are also requested on any guidance that would be needed and the approach the guidance should take. In addition to general comments, the Treasury and IRS also request comments on the desirability and effect of applying the rules in specific areas and the guidance need.
Comments should be submitted 90 days after the Notice requesting comments is published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, with consideration for comments submitted after that date that do not delay the guidance. Comments may be submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal www.regulations.com or or by mail to: Internal Revenue Service, CC:PA:01:PR (Notice 2025-6, Room 5203, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C., 20044.
Proposed Sourcing Rules for Cloud Transactions
Gross income from a cloud transaction is sourced as services. Under the Code, gross income from the performance of services is sourced to the place where the service is performed.
To determine the place of performance, the proposed regulations would take into account the location of the employees and assets, including both tangible and intangible assets, that contribute to the provision of cloud transactions. The sourcing rules would apply on a taxpayer-by-taxpayer basis.
The place of performance of a cloud transactions is established through a formula composed of a fraction that has three parts-the intangible property factor, the personnel factor, and the tangible property factor. The factors make up the denominator of the fraction. The numerator is the sum of each portion of each factor that is from sources within the United States. The gross income from a cloud transaction multiplied by the fraction is the U.S. source portion of the gross income.
Proposed Regulations, NPRM REG-107420-24
Notice 2025-6
The IRS has released final regulations implementing the clean hydrogen production credit under Code Sec. 45V, as well as the election to treat a clean hydrogen production facility as energy property for purposes of the energy investment credit under Code Sec. 48. The regulations generally apply to tax years beginning after December 26, 2023.
The IRS has released final regulations implementing the clean hydrogen production credit under Code Sec. 45V, as well as the election to treat a clean hydrogen production facility as energy property for purposes of the energy investment credit under Code Sec. 48. The regulations generally apply to tax years beginning after December 26, 2023.
The regulations adopt the proposed regulations (REG-117631-23) with certain modifications. Rules are provided for determining lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions rates resulting from hydrogen production processes; petitioning for provisional emissions rates; verifying production and sale or use of clean hydrogen; modifying or retrofitting existing qualified clean hydrogen production facilities; and using electricity from certain renewable or zero-emissions sources to produce qualified clean hydrogen.
Background
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-169) added Code Sec. 45V to provide a tax credit to produce qualified clean hydrogen produced after 2022 at a qualified clean hydrogen production facility during the 10-year period beginning on the date the facility is originally placed in service.
The credit is calculated by multiplying an applicable amount by the kilograms of qualified clean hydrogen produced. The applicable amount ranges from $0.12 to $0.60 per kilogram depending on the level of lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production of the hydrogen. The credit is multiplied by five if the qualified clean hydrogen production facility meets certain prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements.
Qualified Facility and Emissions Rate
The regulations provide that a qualified clean hydrogen production facility is a single production line that is used to produce qualified clean hydrogen. This includes all components, including multipurpose components, of property that function interdependently to produce qualified clean hydrogen through a process that results in the lifecycle GHG emissions rate used to determine the credit. It does not include equipment used to condition or transport hydrogen beyond the point of production, or feedstock-related equipment.
The lifecycle GHG emissions rate is determined under the latest publicly available 45VH2-GREET Model developed by the Argonne National Laboratory on the first day of the tax year during which the qualified clean hydrogen was produced. If a version of 45VH2-GREET becomes publicly available after the first day of the taxa year of production (but still within such tax year), then the taxpayer may elect to use the subsequent model.
Verifying Production and Sale
Code Sec. 45V requires the clean hydrogen to be produced for sale or use. No hydrogen is qualified clean hydrogen unless its production, sale, or use is verified by an unrelated party. A verification report prepared by a qualified verifier must be attached to a taxpayer’s Form 7210 for each qualified clean hydrogen production facility and for each tax year the Code Sec. 45V credit is claimed. The regulations outline the requirements for a verification report. They also contain requirements for the third-party verifier to perform to attest that the qualified clean hydrogen has been sold or used by a person for verifiable use.
Modified and Retrofitted Facilities
A facility placed in service before 2023 that is modified to produce qualified clean hydrogen may be eligible for the credit so long as the taxpayer’s expenses to modify the facility as chargeable to the capital account. However, merely changing fuel inputs does not constitute a modification for this purpose. A modification must enable to the facility to produce qualified clean hydrogen if it not before the modification to meet the lifecycle GHG emissions rate. Alternatively, an existing facility may be retrofitted to qualify for the credit provided that the fair market value of used property in the facility is not more than 20 percent of the facility’s total value (80/20 Rule).
Energy Credit Election
A taxpayer that owns and places in service a specified clean hydrogen production facility can make an irrevocable election to treat any qualified property that is part of the facility as energy property for purposes of the energy investment credit under Code Sec. 48. The final regulations contain definition of a specified facility, the energy percentage for the investment credit, and the time and manner for making the election. The rules include a safe harbor for determining the beginning of construction and using a provisional emissions rate (PER) to calculate the investment credit.
The IRS issued updates to frequently asked questions (FAQs) about the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit (Code Sec. 25C) and the Residential Clean Energy Property Credit (Code Sec. 25D). The former credit applies to qualifying property placed in service on or after January 1, 2023, and before January 1, 2033. The updates pertained to FS-2024-15. More information is available here.
The IRS issued updates to frequently asked questions (FAQs) about the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit (Code Sec. 25C) and the Residential Clean Energy Property Credit (Code Sec. 25D). The former credit applies to qualifying property placed in service on or after January 1, 2023, and before January 1, 2033. The updates pertained to FS-2024-15. More information is available here.
Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit
The credit is limited to $2,000 per taxpayer per taxable year in the aggregate for electric or natural gas heat pump water heaters, electric or natural gas heat pumps, and biomass stoves or boilers.
Thus, a taxpayer could claim a total credit of $3,200 if they had sufficient expenditures in property categories (or a home energy audit) subject to the $1,200 limitation and in property categories subject to the $2,000 limitation.
Additionally, a taxpayer can claim the credit only for qualifying expenditures incurred for an existing home, or for an addition to or renovation of an existing home, but not for a newly constructed home.
Residential Clean Energy Property Credit
One of the FAQs mentions that this credit is a nonrefundable personal tax credit. A taxpayer claiming a nonrefundable credit can only use it to decrease or eliminate tax liability.
The credit is generally limited to 30 percent of qualified expenditures made for property placed in service between 2022 and 2032. However, the credit allowed for qualified fuel cell property expenditures is 30 percent of the expenditures, up to a maximum credit of $500 for each half kilowatt of capacity of the qualified fuel cell property.
The IRS has provided updated guidance on the implementation of section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-600), as amended, regarding controversies involving whether individuals are "employees" for employment tax purposes. Section 530 (which is not an Internal Revenue Code section) provides relief for employers who are involved in worker classification status disputes with the IRS and face large employment tax assessments as a result of the IRS’s proposed reclassifications of workers.
The IRS has provided updated guidance on the implementation of section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-600), as amended, regarding controversies involving whether individuals are "employees" for employment tax purposes. Section 530 (which is not an Internal Revenue Code section) provides relief for employers who are involved in worker classification status disputes with the IRS and face large employment tax assessments as a result of the IRS’s proposed reclassifications of workers.
Section 530 Safe Harbor
Section 530 provides that an employer will not be liable for federal employment taxes regarding an individual or class of workers if certain statutory requirements are met. Section 530 relief applies only if the taxpayer did not treat the individual as an employee for federal employment tax purposes for the period at issue, and meets each of the following requirements for that period:
- the taxpayer filed all required federal tax returns, including information returns, on a basis that is consistent with the taxpayer’s treatment of the individual as not being an employee (reporting consistency requirement);
- the taxpayer did not treat the individual or any individual holding a substantially similar position as an employee (substantive consistency requirement); and
- the taxpayer had a reasonable basis for not treating the individual as an employee (reasonable basis requirement).
Rev. Proc. 85-18, 1985-1 CB 518, provided instructions for implementing section 530 relating to the employment tax status of independent contractors and employees.
Updated Guidance
The updated guidance clarifies provisions in Rev. Proc. 85-18 regarding the definition of employee, the section 530 requirement for the filing of required returns, and the reasonable basis safe harbor rules. The updated guidance also includes new provisions that reflect certain statutory changes made to section 530 since 1986.
Among other things, the updated guidance amplifies guidelines in Rev. Proc. 85-18 which interpreted the word “treat” for purposes of determining whether a taxpayer did not treat an individual as an employee for section 530 purposes. Under the updated guidance, with respect to any individual, actions that indicate “treatment” of the individual as an employee for section 530 purposes include:
- withholding of income tax or FICA taxes from any payments made;
- filing of an original or amended employment tax return;
- filing or issuance of a Form W-2; and
- contracting with a third party to perform acts required of employers.
Provisions in Rev. Proc. 85-18 that explained how refunds, credits, abatements, and handling of claims applied to taxpayers who were under audit or otherwise involved in administrative or judicial processes with the IRS at the time of enactment of section 530 are no longer applicable and were not included in the updated guidance. Section 530 relief remains available at any stage in the administrative or judicial process if the requirements for relief are met.
Effect on Other Documents
Rev. Proc. 85-18, 1985-1 CB 518, is modified and superseded.
The IRS has issued final regulation identifying certain partnership related-party basis adjustment transactions as transactions of interest (TOI), a type of reportable transaction under Reg. §1.6011-4. Taxpayers that participate and material advisors to these transactions, and substantially similar transactions, are required to disclose as much to the IRS using Form 8886 and Form 8918, respectively, or be subject to penalties.
The IRS has issued final regulation identifying certain partnership related-party basis adjustment transactions as transactions of interest (TOI), a type of reportable transaction under Reg. §1.6011-4. Taxpayers that participate and material advisors to these transactions, and substantially similar transactions, are required to disclose as much to the IRS using Form 8886 and Form 8918, respectively, or be subject to penalties.
Basis Adjustment Transactions
A transaction is covered by the regulations if a partnership with two or more related partners engages in any of the following transactions.
- The partnership makes a current or liquidating distribution of property to a partner who is related to one or more partners, and the partnership increases the basis of one or more of its remaining properties under Code Sec. 734(b) and (c) by more than $10 million ($25 million for tax years before 2025).
- The partnership distributes property to a partner related to one or more partners in liquidation of the partnership interest, and the basis of one or more distributed properties is increased under Code Sec. 732(b) and (c) by more than $10 million ($25 million for tax years before 2025).
- The partnership distributes property to a partner who is related to one or more partners, the basis of one or more distributed properties is increased under Code Sec. 732(d) by more than $10 million ($25 million for tax years before 2025), and the related partner acquired all or a part of its interest in the partnership in a transaction that would have been a basis adjustment transaction had a Code Sec. 754 election been in effect.
A basis adjustment transaction for this purpose would occur if a partner transferred an interest in the partnership to a related partner in a nonrecognition transaction, and the basis of one or more partnership properties is increased under Code Sec. 743(b)(1) and (c) by more than $10 million ($25 million for tax years before 2025).
Retroactive Reporting
The final regulations limit the disclosure rule for open tax years that fall withing a six-year lookback window. The window is the seventy-two-month period before the first month of a taxpayer’s most recent tax year that began before January 14, 2025. The basis increase threshold in a TOI during the six-year lookback period is $25 million.
A taxpayer has until July 13, 2025, to file disclosure statements for TOIs in open tax years for which a tax return has already been filed and that fall within the six-year lookback window. Material advisors have until April 14, 2025, to file their disclosure statements for tax statements made before the final regulations.
Regulations under Code Sec. 2801, which imposes a tax on covered gifts and covered bequests received by a citizen or resident of the United States from a covered expatriate, have been issued.
Regulations under Code Sec. 2801, which imposes a tax on covered gifts and covered bequests received by a citizen or resident of the United States from a covered expatriate, have been issued.
Definitions
Reg. §28.2801-1 provides the general rules of liability imposed by Code Sec. 2801. For purposes of Code Sec. 2801, domestic trusts and foreign trusts electing to be treated as domestic trusts are treated as U.S. citizens. Terms used in chapter 15 of the Code are defined in Reg. §28.2801-2. The definition of the term “resident” is the transfer tax definition, which reduces opportunities to avoid the expatriate tax and is consistent with the purpose of the statute. The definition of “covered bequest” identifies three categories of property that are included in the definition and subject to tax under Code Sec. 2801. Reg. §§28.2801-2(i)(2) and (5) modify the definitions of an indirect acquisition of property.
Exceptions to the definitions of covered gifts and bequests are detailed in Reg. §28.2801-3. The timely payment of the tax shown on the covered expatriate’s gift or estate tax return was eliminated from the regulations as it relates to the exception from the definitions of covered gift and covered bequest. A rule was added in Reg. §28.2801-3(c)(3) that would limit the value of a covered bequest to the amount that exceeds the value of a covered gift to which tax under Code Sec. 2801 was previously imposed.
Covered Gifts and Bequests Made in Trust
Reg. §28.2801-3(d) provides rules regarding covered gifts and covered bequests made in trust, including transfers of property in trust that are subject to a general power of appointment granted by the covered expatriate. Contrary to the gift tax rule treating the trust beneficiary or holder of an immediate right to withdraw as the recipient of property, the rules treat transfers in trust that are covered gifts or bequests as transfers to the trust, which are taxed under Code Sec. 2801(e)(4). Consistent with the estate and gift tax rules, the exercise, release, or lapse of a covered expatriate’s general power of appointment for the benefit of a U.S. citizen or resident is a covered gift or covered bequest. Only for purposes of Code Sec. 2801, a covered expatriate’s grant of a general power of appointment over property not held in trust is a covered gift or bequest to the powerholder as soon as both the power is exercisable and the transfer of the property subject to the power is irrevocable.
Liability for Payment and Computation of Tax
Reg. §28.2801-4 provides rules regarding who is liable for the payment of the tax. In general, the U.S. citizen or resident, including a domestic trust, who receives the covered gift or bequest is liable for paying the tax. A non-electing foreign trust is not a U.S. citizen and is not liable for the tax. The U.S. citizen or resident who receives distributions from a non-electing foreign trust is liable on the receipt of the distribution to the extent the distribution is attributable to a covered gift or bequest. Rules regarding the date on which a recipient receives covered gifts or bequests are explained in Reg. §28.2801-4(d)(8)(ii). Reg. §28.2801-4(a)(2)(iii) is reserved to address charitable remainder and charitable lead trusts.
The manner in which the tax is computed is set forth in Reg. §28.2801-4(e). The value of the covered gift or bequest is the fair market value of the property on the date of its receipt, which is explained in Reg. §28.2801-4(d). A refund is allowed under Code Sec. 6511 if foreign gift or estate tax is paid after payment of the Code Sec. 2801 tax. In that scenario, the U.S recipient should file a claim for refund or a protective claim for refund on or before the application period of limitations has expired.
Foreign Trusts
Reg. §28.2801-5 sets forth rules applicable to foreign trusts, including the computation of the amount of a distribution from a foreign trust that is attributable to a covered gift or bequest made to the foreign trust. The election by a foreign trust to be treated as a domestic trust is explained in Reg. §28.2801-5(d)(3).
Other Rules
Reg. §28.2801-6 addresses special rules, including the determination of basis and the applicability of the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax to certain Code Sec. 2801 transfers. Reg. §28.2801-6(d) discusses applicable penalties. Reg. §28.2801-7 provides guidance on the responsibility of a U.S. recipient to determine if tax under Code Sec. 2801 is due. Administrative regulations that address filing and payment due dates, returns, extension requests, and recordkeeping requirements with respect to the Code Sec. 2801 tax are also provided.
Due Date of Form 708
Form 708, United States Return of Tax for Gifts and Bequests from Covered Expatriates, is generally due on or before the 15th day of the 18th calendar month following the close of the calendar year in which the covered gift or bequest was received. The due date for Form 708 is further explained in Reg. 28.6071-1. Form 708 has yet to be issued by the IRS.
The regulations are generally effective on January 14, 2025.
The IRS has issued a revenue ruling addressing the federal tax treatment of contributions and benefits under state-administered paid family and medical leave (PFML) programs. The ruling clarifies how these contributions and benefits are classified for income tax, employment tax, and reporting purposes, with distinctions drawn between employer and employee contributions.
The IRS has issued a revenue ruling addressing the federal tax treatment of contributions and benefits under state-administered paid family and medical leave (PFML) programs. The ruling clarifies how these contributions and benefits are classified for income tax, employment tax, and reporting purposes, with distinctions drawn between employer and employee contributions.
PFML Contributions
Mandatory contributions made by employers under PFML programs are classified as excise taxes deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses under Code Sec. 164. These payments are deemed state-imposed obligations for the purpose of funding public programs and are not included in employees' gross income under Code Sec. 61. In contrast, mandatory contributions withheld from employees’ wages are treated as state income taxes under Code Sec. 164(a)(3). Employees may deduct these amounts on their federal tax returns if they itemize deductions, subject to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap under Code Sec. 164(b)(6).
The ruling further specifies the treatment of benefits paid under PFML programs. Family leave benefits, which provide wage replacement during caregiving periods, are included in the recipient’s gross income under Code Sec. 61 but are not considered wages for federal employment tax purposes under Code Sec. 3121. By comparison, medical leave benefits attributable to employee contributions are excluded from gross income under Code Sec. 104(a)(3). However, medical leave benefits attributable to employer contributions are partially taxable under Code Sec. 105 and are subject to FICA taxes.
The ruling also addresses scenarios where employers voluntarily cover portions of employees’ contributions, referred to as "employer pick-ups." Such pick-ups are treated as additional compensation, included in employees’ gross income under Code Sec. 61, and are subject to federal employment taxes. Employers, however, may deduct these payments as ordinary business expenses under Code Sec. 162.
To ensure compliance, the IRS requires states and employers to report benefits exceeding $600 annually under Code Sec. 6041 using Form 1099. Additionally, benefits subject to employment taxes must be reported on Form W-2.
The ruling modifies prior guidance and includes a transition period for 2025 to allow states and employers to adjust their systems to meet reporting and compliance requirements. This clarification provides a framework for managing the tax implications of PFML programs, ensuring consistent treatment across jurisdictions.
Effective Date
This revenue ruling is effective for payments made on or after January 1, 2025. However, transition relief is provided to the states, the District of Columbia, and employers from certain withholding, payment, and information reporting requirements for state-paid medical leave benefits paid made during calendar year 2025.
Effect on Other Guidance
Rev. Rul. 81-194, Rev. Rul. 81-193, Rev. Rul. 81-192, and Rev. Rul. 81-191 are amplified to include the holdings in this revenue ruling that are applicable to the facts in those rulings. Rev. Rul. 72-191, as modified by Rev. Rul. 81-192, is further modified.
Rev. Rul. 2025-4
National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins identified the lengthy processing and uncertainty regarding the employee retention credit as being among the ten most serious problems facing taxpayers.
National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins identified the lengthy processing and uncertainty regarding the employee retention credit as being among the ten most serious problems facing taxpayers.
"Although the [Internal Revenue Service] has processed several hundred thousand claims in recent months, it was still sitting on a backlog of about 1.2 million claims as of October 26, 2024," Collins noted in her just released 2024 Annual Report to Congress. "Many claims have been pending for more than a year, and with the imminent start of the 2025 filing season, the IRS will shift its focus and resources to administering the filing season, resulting in even longer ERC processing delays."
Collins is calling on the IRS to provide more specific information with claims denials, more transparency on the timing of claims processing, and allowing taxpayers to submit documentation and seek an appeal before disallowing a claim that was not subject to an audit.
In addition to ERC processing, Collins identified delays in processing of tax returns as another serious problem taxpayers are facing, including delays associated with the more than 10 million paper 1040 returns and more than 75 million paper-filed returns and forms overall each year, as well as issues surrounding rejections of e-filed returns, most of which are valid returns. These delays end up delaying refunds and can be particularly hard on low-income filers who are receiving the Earned Income Tax Credit.
"We recommend the IRS continue to prioritize automating its tax processing systems, including by scanning all paper-filed tax returns in time for the 2026 filing season and processing amended tax returns automatically," the report states.
Another processing issue identified in the report deals with delays in processing and refunds for victims of identity theft.
Collins reported that the delays in addressing identity theft issues grew to 22 months in fiscal year 2024, affecting nearly 500,000 taxpayers.
"The IRS has advised us that it has begun to prioritize resolution of cases involving refunds over balance-due returns rather than following its traditional ‘first in, first out’ approach," the report states. "This is somewhat good news, but I strongly encourage the IRS to fix this problem once and for all during the coming year."
Other issues in the top 10 include:
- Taxpayer service is often not timely or adequate;
- The prevalence of tax-related scams;
- Employment recruitment, hiring, training, and retention challenges are hindering transformational change within the industry;
- The dependence on paper forms and manual document review in processing Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers is causing delays and potential security risks;
- Limited taxpayer financial and tax literacy;
- The IRS’s administration of civil tax penalties is often unfair, inconsistently deters improper behavior, fails to promote efficient administration, and thus discourages tax compliance; and
- Changes to the IRS’s criminal voluntary disclosure practice requirements may be reducing voluntary compliance and negatively impacting the tax gap.
Collins also called on Congress to ensure the IRS receives adequate funding specifically for taxpayer services and technology upgrades, noting that many improvements that are highlighted in the report were made possible by the Inflation Reduction Act, which provided supplemental funding to the agency.
"Much of the funding has generated controversy – namely, the funding allocated for enforcement," the report notes. "But some of the funding has received strong bipartisan support – namely, the funding allocated for taxpayer services and technology modernization."
She reported that telephone service has improved dramatically, correspondence processing has improved dramatically, and in-person has become more accessible following the IRA funding, as well as technology improvements including increased scanning and processing of paper-filed tax returns electronically; increases in electronic correspondence; expansion of secure messaging; the ability to submit forms from mobile phones; and increases in both chatbot and voicebot technology.
"I want to highlight this distinction so that if Congress decides to cut IRA funding, it does not inadvertently throw the baby out with the bathwater," she reports.
By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor
A taxpayer's expenses incurred due to travel outside of the United States for business activities are deductible, but under a stricter set of rules than domestic travel. Foreign travel expenses may be subject to special allocation rules if a taxpayer engages in personal activities while traveling on business. Expenses subject to allocation include travel fares, meals, lodging, and other expenses incident to travel.
Allocation expenses
Frequently, international business trips have a personal aspect. A taxpayer who travels outside of the United States for both business and pleasure may deduct no part of his or her travel expenses (airfare, cabs, hotel, meals, etc.) if the trip is not primarily related to business. However, business expenses incurred while at the destination are deductible even though the travel expenses are not.
If the trip is primarily related to business, then that portion of travel properly allocated to the business portion may be deducted. Proper allocation is based on the amount of time spent on each activity. "Primary purpose" is a purpose of more than 50 percent. Foreign travel for purposes of allocation is travel outside the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Important exceptionsThe general "primary purpose" rule on foreign business travel, fortunately, has two huge exceptions, one for anyone who travels a week or less and the other for most employees on business trips under an expenses allowance arrangement.
The allocation rules do not apply to taxpayers:
- who do not have substantial control over the business trip;
- whose travel outside the United States is a week or less in duration;
- who establish that a personal vacation was not a major factor in deciding to take the trip; and
- whose personal activities conducted during the trip are less than 25 percent of the total travel time.
Taxpayers who travel under reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangements are not considered to have substantial control over the business trip unless they are the managing executive of the employer or a party related to, or more than 10 percent owner of the employer.
Conventions
Business conventions come under a separate rule. A taxpayer cannot deduct travel expenses for attending a convention, seminar or similar business meeting held outside the "North American area" unless specific criteria are satisfied. The "North American area" includes not only the US, Canada, and Mexico but also Costa Rica, Honduras and many islands in the Atlantic, Caribbean, and the Pacific.
If you are unsure of how to allocate your business travel expenses and need additional information, please give our office a call. We would be glad to help.
With the subprime mortgage mess wreaking havoc across the country, many homeowners who over-extended themselves with creative financing arrangements and exotic loan terms are now faced with some grim tax realities. Not only are they confronted with the overwhelming possibility of losing their homes either voluntarily through selling at a loss or involuntarily through foreclosure, but they must accept certain tax consequences for which they are totally unprepared.
Many homeowners - whether in connection with their principal residence or a vacation property - may not anticipate that foreclosure and a home sale that produces a loss can trigger significant and unexpected income tax liabilities, especially when the sale does not produce enough gain to pay off outstanding mortgage debt.
Selling at a loss
Homeowners may be unpleasantly surprised to learn that they can not write-off losses incurred from the sale of their home. When a homeowner is forced to sell their personal residence for less than the price they paid, the loss incurred on the sale is considered to be a non-deductible personal expense for federal income tax purposes. What's more, if the homeowner eventually buys another home that is sold down the road at a taxable profit, previous losses cannot be used to offset that gain.
Faced with such a situation, the technique of renting out the home, rather than selling it, might help some homeowner buy time until better times. If renting eventually stops making financial sense, the homeowner who sells at a loss might then succeed in establishing a deductible business loss from the business of renting property. However, only losses incurred after the property is converted may be deducted.
Debt forgiveness
Homeowners who sell their property when their mortgage debt exceeds the net sale price of the home (a so-called "short sale") may find that they owe taxes to the IRS. For example, assume you paid $500,000 for a home that you sell for a net sale price of $400,000, but you have a mortgage of $550,000 on the property. For tax purposes, you have incurred a $100,000 loss on the sale because the sale price is lower than your tax basis in the property ($400,000 sale price - $500,000 basis = $100,000 loss). Moreover, you still owe $150,000 to your mortgage lender since a mortgage note is a personal liability in addition to being an encumbrance on the house itself. If the lender refuses to discharge the remaining debt, you'll have to pay off the loan and there is no tax break or write-off for doing so.
On the other hand, if the mortgage lender forgives part or all of the remaining $150,000 debt, the amount discharged is considered taxable income. With few exceptions, discharged debt of all types is treated as income, taxable at ordinary rates just like a salary. It is irrelevant to the IRS that no tangible income was actually received on the sale of the home or forgiveness of debt by the lender. You will owe taxes on the amount of mortgage debt that the lender discharges. What's more, there is no offset from your $100,000 loss on the sale of the property; nor is this income covered by the $250,000 exclusion on taxable gain on the sale of a principal residence ($500,000 for joint filers).
A lender who discharges any part or all of a homeowner's debt must report the forgiven debt on Form 1099-C (Cancellation of Debt) to you and to the IRS. You must report the amount of discharged debt as income on your tax return in the year the mortgage debt is forgiven.
Foreclosure
Foreclosure also produces tax consequences that may be wholly unanticipated by the homeowner. Taxable gains and income from mortgage debt forgiveness also occur in foreclosure. Tax liability upon foreclosure depends on whether you have a nonrecourse or recourse loan. A recourse loan permits the lender to sue the borrower for any outstanding debt. When a foreclosure occurs on the property of a homeowner with a nonrecourse loan, however, the lender is only entitled to collect the amount that the home is sold for, and the borrower has no further liability.
Example. Your tax basis in your home is $400,000. You have a recourse loan and your mortgage debt totals $350,000. But at the time of foreclosure the fair market value of your home has decreased to $325,000. However, the lender forgives the remaining unpaid mortgage debt of $25,000 (usually because the lender sees that the former homeowner has little assets left, the remaining debt would be hard to collect, and an immediate write off gives the lender an immediate tax deduction). Tax law treats you as having received ordinary income from the cancellation of the debt in the amount of $25,000.
Alternatively, if you had a nonrecourse loan in the amount of $350,000 and your home sold at auction for $325,000, you would have no further liability to the lender since it cannot pursue you for the lost $25,000. Therefore, since your mortgage lender cannot legally pursue you for the remaining $25,000, there will be no debt for them to discharge. Such nonrecourse loans, however, are very rare in personal, non-business settings.
Moreover, if property is foreclosed and sold at auction for more than the home's tax basis, the sale produces taxable gain. In this case, however, the gain from a foreclosure sale of an individual's principal residence may be excluded to the extent of up to $250,000 ($500,000 for married homeowners filing jointly), depending on the length of homeownership. No exclusion, however, is given on vacation property that is not a principal residence.
Future relief for homeowners?
In mid-April, Reps. Robert E. Andrews (D-New Jersey) and Ron Lewis (R-Kentucky), introduced the Mortgage Cancellation Relief Act of 2007 (H.R. 1876), a bill that would assist many homeowners affected by the loss of their home through foreclosure or short sale. The legislation would exempt discharged debt on primary home mortgages from treatment as income subject to income taxation. Currently, the bill is before the House Ways and Means Committee.
If you would like more information on the tax consequences of foreclosure or the potential implications of taking a loss on the sale of your home or vacation property, please call our office and we can discuss your options for minimizing your tax liabilities.
These days, both individuals and businesses buy goods, services, even food on-line. Credit card payments and other bills are paid over the internet, from the comfort of one's home or office and without any trip to the mailbox or post office.
Now, what is probably your biggest "bill" can be paid on-line: your federal income taxes.
There are three online federal tax payment options available for both businesses and individuals: electronic funds withdrawal, credit card payments and the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System. If you are not doing so already, you should certainly consider the convenience -and safety-- of paying your tax bill online. While all the options are now "mainstream" and have been used for at least several years, safe and convenient, each has its own benefits as well as possible drawbacks. The pros and cons of each payment option should be weighed in light of your needs and preferences.
Electronic Funds Withdrawal
Electronic funds withdrawal (or EFW) is available only to taxpayers who e-file their returns. EFW is available whether you e-file on your own, or with the help of a tax professional or software such as TurboTax. E-filing and e-paying through EFW eliminates the need to send in associated paper forms.
Through EFW, you schedule when a tax payment is to be directly withdrawn from your bank account. The EFW option allows you to e-file early and, at the same time, schedule a tax payment in the future. The ability to schedule payment for a specific day is an important feature since you decide when the payment is taken out of your account. You can even schedule a payment right up to your particular filing deadline.
The following are some of the tax liabilities you can pay with EFW:
- Individual income tax returns (Form 1040)
- Trust and estate income tax returns (Form 1041)
- Partnership income tax returns (Forms 1065 and 1065-B)
- Corporation income tax returns for Schedule K-1 (Forms 1120, 1120S, and 1120POL)
- Estimated tax for individuals (Form 1040)
- Unemployment taxes (Form 940)
- Quarterly employment taxes (Form 941)
- Employers annual federal tax return (Form 944)
- Private foundation returns (Form 990-PF)
- Heavy highway vehicle use returns (Form 2290)
- Quarterly federal excise tax returns (Form 720)
For a return filed after the filing deadline, the payment is effective on the filing date. However, electronic funds withdrawals can not be initiated after the tax return or Form 1040 is filed with the IRS. Moreover, a scheduled payment can be canceled up until two days before the payment.
EFW does not allow you to make payments greater than the balance you owe on your return. Therefore, you can't pay any penalty or interest due through EFW and would need to choose another option for these types of payments. While a payment can be cancelled up to two business days before the scheduled payment date, once your e-filed return is accepted by the IRS, your scheduled payment date cannot be changed. Thus, if you need to change the date of the payment, you have to cancel the original payment transaction and chose another payment method. Importantly, if your financial institution can't process your payment, such as if there are insufficient funds, you are responsible for making the payment, including potential penalties and interest. Finally, while EFW is a free service provided by the Treasury, your financial institution most likely charges a "convenience fee."
Credit Card Payments
Do you have your card ready? The Treasury Department is now accepting American Express, Discover, MasterCard, and VISA.
Both businesses and individual taxpayers can make tax payments with a credit card, whether they file a paper return or e-file. A credit card payment can be made by phone, when e-filing with tax software or a professional tax preparer, or with an on-line service provider authorized by the IRS. Some tax software developers offer integrated e-file and e-pay options for taxpayers who e-file their return and want to use a credit card to pay a balance due.
However, there is a convenience fee charged by service providers. While fees vary by service provider, they are typically based on the amount of your tax payment or a flat fee per transaction. For example, you owe $2,500 in taxes and your service provider charges a 2.49% convenience fee. The total fee to the service provider will be $62.25. Generally, the minimum convenience fee is $1.00 and they can rise to as much as 3.93% of your payment.
The following are some tax payments that can be made with a credit card:
- Individual income tax returns (Form 1040)
- Estimated income taxes for individuals (Form 1040-ES)
- Unemployment taxes (Form 940)
- Quarterly employment taxes (Form 941)
- Employers annual federal tax returns (Form 944)
- Corporate income tax returns (Form 1120)
- S-corporation returns (Form 1120S)
- Extension for corporate returns (Form 7004)
- Income tax returns for private foundations (Form 990-PF)
However, as is the case is with the EFW option, if a service provider fails to forward your payment to the Treasury, you are responsible for the missed payment, including potential penalties and interest.
Electronic Federal Tax Payment System
EFTPS is a system that allows individuals and businesses to pay all their federal taxes electronically, including income, employment, estimated, and excise taxes. EFTPS is available to both individuals and businesses and, once enrolled, taxpayers can use the system to pay their taxes 24 hours a day, seven days a week, year round. Businesses can schedule payments 120 days in advance while individuals can schedule payments 365 days in advance. With EFTPS, you indicate the date on which funds are to be moved from your account to pay your taxes. You can also change or cancel a payment up to 2 business days in advance of the scheduled payment date.
EFTPS is an ideal payment option for taxpayers who make monthly installment agreement payments or quarterly 1040ES estimated payments. Businesses should also consider using EFTPS to make payments that their third-party provider is not making for them.
EFTPS is a free tax payment system provided by the Treasury Department that allows you to make all your tax payments on-line or by phone. You must enroll in EFTPS, however, but the process is simple.
We would be happy to discuss these payment options and which may best suit your individual or business needs. Please call our office learn more about your on-line federal tax payment options.
Fringe benefits have not only become an important component of employee compensation, they also have a large financial impact on an employer's business. Fringe benefits are non-compensation benefits provided by an employer to employees. Unless they fall within one of the specific categories of tax-exempt fringe benefits, however, are taxable to employees.
Qualified employee discounts are among several categories of fringe benefits that are non-taxable to the employee under Code Sec. 132 and also deductible by the employer as an ordinary and necessary business expense. If you want to give employee discounts, this is the type you should consider first.
Qualified employee discounts
For an employee discount to be excludable from an employee's income and deductible by the employer, it must constitute a qualified employee discount. A qualified employee discount is an employee discount provided on qualified property or services. If the benefits are not qualified, they are taxable to the employee.
Qualified employee discounts are those that are provided on products or services sold in the ordinary course of the employer's line of business. For instance, employee discounts on items sold only at an employee store are not excludable from gross income because they are not offered for sale to non-employee customers in the ordinary course of the employer's line of business.
An employer may exclude the value of an employee discount provided to an employee from his or her wages, up to the following limits:
- For a discount on services, 20% of the price the employer charges non-employee customers for the service.
- For a discount on merchandise or other property, the employer's gross profit percentage times the price the employer charges non-employee customers for the property.
For example, if an employer's business sells a product for $100 and its cost is $75, the gross profit margin is $25. Therefore, to be tax-free to the employee, the discount cannot exceed $25. If an employer charges customers $100 for a certain service, the employee's tax-free discount for the same service cannot exceed $20 (i.e. 20 percent of the value of the service). Any excess discount will be treated as taxable income to the employee.
Qualified employee discounts can be provided through a direct reduction in the price of property or services as well through a cash rebate system. However, the discounts cannot be provided on real estate or investment property, such as stocks and bonds.
Non-discrimination
Qualified employee discounts must be available to employees on a nondiscriminatory basis, which requires that the benefits be available on substantially the same terms to all employees or to each member of a reasonable classification of employees that does not discriminate in favor of highly compensation employees. An employer engaged in more than one line of business must treat each line of business separately in applying the discrimination test. If an employer's plan fails the test, only your employees who are not highly compensated may exclude the value of the benefit from income.
Business expense deduction
An employer can deduct the actual cost of providing fringe benefits to employees as an ordinary and necessary business expense, whether or not the benefits are taxable to the employees. Employers can deduct the cost of providing qualified employee discounts as either compensation for services rendered or as a tax deductible business expense under Code Sec. 162.
As with other business expenses incurred by an employer for which tax deductions are sought, expenses paid or incurred in carrying on a trade or business are deductible only if they are ordinary and necessary. Ordinary and necessary expenses must be reasonable in amount to be deductible.
Because a qualified employee discount is a type of fringe benefit (albeit tax exempt), and fringe benefits are a form of employee compensation under Code Sec. 61, a qualified employee discount will meet the business expense requirements of Code Sec. 162, providing for deduction by an employer. Thus, employers can deduct the cost of qualified employee discounts and not pay any employment taxes on them.
In order to be tax deductible, compensation must be a reasonable payment for services. Smaller companies, whose employees frequently hold significant ownership interests, are particularly vulnerable to IRS attack on their compensation deductions.
In order to be tax deductible, compensation must be a reasonable payment for services. Smaller companies, whose employees frequently hold significant ownership interests, are particularly vulnerable to IRS attack on their compensation deductions.
Reasonable compensation is generally defined as the amount that would ordinarily be paid for like services by like enterprises under like circumstances. This broad definition is supplemented, for purposes of determining whether compensation is deductible as an ordinary and necessary expense, by a number of more specific factors expressed in varying forms by the IRS, the Tax Court and the Circuit Courts of Appeal, and generally relating to the type and extent of services provided, the financial concerns of the company, and the nature of the relationship between the employee and the employer.
Why IRS Is Interested
A chief concern behind the IRS's keen interest in what a company calls "compensation" is the possibility that what is being labeled compensation is in fact a constructive dividend. If employees with ownership interests are being paid excessive amounts by the company, the IRS may challenge compensation deductions on the grounds that what is being called deductible compensation is, in fact, a nondeductible dividend.
Another area of concern for the IRS is the payment of personal expenses of an employee that are disguised as businesses expenses. There, the business is trying to obtain a business expense deduction without the offsetting tax paid by the employee in recognizing income. In such cases, a business and its owners can end up with a triple loss after an IRS audit: taxable income to the individual, no deduction to the business and a tax penalty due from both parties.
Factors Examined
The factors most often examined by the IRS in deciding whether payments are reasonable compensation for services or are, instead, disguised dividend payments, include:
- The salary history of the individual employee
- Compensation paid by comparable employers to comparable employees
- The salary history of other employees of the company
- Special employee expertise or efforts
- Year-end payments
- Independent inactive investor analysis
- Deferred compensation plan contributions
- Independence of the board of directors
- Viewpoint of a hypothetical investor contemplating purchase of the company as to whether such potential investor would be willing to pay the compensation.
Failure to pass the reasonable compensation test will result in the company's loss of all or part of its deduction. Analysis and examination of a company's compensation deductions in light of the relevant listed factors can provide the company with the assurance that the compensation it pays will be treated as reasonable -- and may in the process prevent the loss of its deductions.
Note: In the case of publicly held corporations, a separate $1 million dollar per person cap is also placed on deductible compensation paid to the CEO and each of the four other highest-paid officers identified for SEC purposes. (Certain types of compensation, including performance-based compensation approved by outside directors, are not included in the $1 million limitation.)
The S Corp Enigma
The opposite side of the reasonable compensation coin is present in the case of some S corporations. By characterizing compensation payments as dividends, the owners of these corporations seek to reduce employment taxes due on amounts paid to them by their companies. In these cases, the IRS attempts to recharacterize dividends as salary if the amounts were, in fact, paid to the shareholders for services rendered to the corporation.
Caution. In the course of performing the compensation-dividend analysis, watch out for contingent compensation arrangements and for compensation that is proportional to stock ownership. While not always indicators that payments are distributions of dividends instead of compensation for services, their presence does suggest the possibility. Compensation plans should not be keyed to ownership interests. Contingent and incentive arrangements are also scrutinized by the IRS. The courts have frequently ruled that a shareholder has a built-in interest in seeing that the company is successful and rewarding him for increasing the value of his own property is inappropriate. Similar to the reasonable compensation test, however, this rule is not hard and fast. Accordingly, the rules followed in each jurisdiction will control there.
Conclusions
Determining whether a shareholder-employee's compensation is reasonable depends upon many variables, such as the contributions that employee makes to your business, the compensation levels within your industry, and whether an independent investor in your company would accept the employee's compensation as reasonable.
Please call our office for a more customized analysis of how your particular compensation package fits into the various rules and guidelines. Further examination of your practices not only may help your business better sustain its compensation deductions; it may also help you take advantage of other compensation arrangements and opportunities.
There are tax benefits for which you may be eligible if you are paying education expenses for yourself or an immediate member of your family. In the rush to claim one of two education tax credits or the higher-education expense deduction, IRS statistics indicate that a more modest yet still significant tax break is often being overlooked: the higher education student-loan interest deduction.
The student loan interest deduction for 2006 was the smaller of $2,500 or the amount of interest paid. The deduction amount may be gradually reduced or eliminated based on your filing status and modified adjusted gross income (MAGI).
Form 1098-E
Form 1098-E will help you calculate your student loan interest deduction. An institution that received interest payments of $600 or more during a calendar year on one or more qualified student loans must send Form 1098-E to each borrower.
Modified adjusted gross income
For 2007, the $2,500 maximum deduction for interest paid on qualified education loans begins to phase out ratably for taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income in excess of $55,000 ($110,000 for joint returns), and is completely phased out for taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income of $70,000 or more ($140,000 or more for joint returns).
Reduced deduction
If your credit must be reduced because of your MAGI, you must calculate your reduced deduction. To calculate your reduced amount, multiply your interest deduction (before the reduction) by a fraction. The numerator is your MAGI minus $55,000 ($110,000 for joint return filers). The denominator is $15,000 ($30,000 for joint return filers). Subtract the result from your deduction (before the reduction). This result is the amount you can deduct.
Example A. During 2007 Ed pays $800 interest on a qualified student loan. Ed's 2007 MAGI is $130,000 and he files a joint return. $800 X ($130,000-$110,000 / $30,000) =$533. Ed must reduce his deduction by $533. His reduced student loan interest deduction is $267 ($800 - $533).
Example B. During 2007 Bea, who is single, pays $2,750 interest on a qualified student loan. Bea's maximum deduction for 2007 is $2,500. However, Bea must further limit her maximum deduction since her MAGI is $60,000. Her required reduction is $2,500 x ($60,000 - $55,000 / $15,000) or $833.33 Her reduced student loan interest deduction is $2,500 - $833.33 or $1,666.67.
If you are unsure of your eligibility for the student loan interest deduction, please give our office a call and we will be happy to assist you.